2000 Audi A8 vs. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 2000 Audi A8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2000 Audi A8. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 445 kg more than 2000 Audi A8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Biarritz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A8 | 1962 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A8 | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.3 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 75 L |
