2000 Audi A8 vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 2000 Audi A8 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 695 kg more than 2000 Audi A8.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A8 | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | A8 | Camargue |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 78.3 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 99.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 107 L |