2000 Audi A8 vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Audi A8 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Audi A8. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A8.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A8 (380 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2000 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A8 | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A8 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2670 mm |