2000 Audi A8 vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Audi A8 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,770 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A8 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2000 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A8 (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Celica. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A8 | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A8 | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2430 mm |