2000 Audi A8 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A8 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A8 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A8 (300 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2000 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi A8 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | A8 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2976 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 75 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
