2000 Audi A8 vs. 2006 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi A8 (330 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2006 GMC Canyon. (220 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2006 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 620 kg more than 2000 Audi A8.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A8 (431 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 GMC Canyon. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A8 | 2006 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | A8 | Canyon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 3458 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 431 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 72 L |