2000 Audi A8 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A8 would be higher. At 2,770 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A8 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2006 Rover 75.
Because 2000 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi A8 (280 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A8 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | A8 | 75 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2760 mm |