2000 Audi A8 vs. 2013 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2013 GMC Yukon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi A8 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Yukon (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Audi A8. (330 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Yukon weights approximately 682 kg more than 2000 Audi A8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 GMC Yukon (565 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi A8. (431 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi A8.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A8 | 2013 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | A8 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 431 Nm | 565 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1927 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 15.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 98 L |