2000 Audi Allroad vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Audi Allroad is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Allroad (247 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Allroad should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 310 kg more than 2000 Audi Allroad.
Because 2000 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Allroad | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Allroad | 62 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |