2000 Audi Allroad vs. 2003 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2003 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi Allroad. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi Allroad would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi Allroad weights approximately 435 kg more than 2003 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2000 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Bristol Blenheim (529 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi Allroad. (320 Nm). This means 2003 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi Allroad.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Allroad | 2003 Bristol Blenheim | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | Allroad | Blenheim |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 529 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 105 L |