2000 Audi Allroad vs. 2006 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi Allroad. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi Allroad would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2000 Audi Allroad. (247 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi Allroad.
Because 2000 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi Allroad. (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi Allroad.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Allroad | 2006 Cadillac STS-V | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Allroad | STS-V |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 4376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 440 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 584 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |