2000 Audi R8 vs. 1952 Rover P4
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rover P4 would be higher. At 3,595 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi R8 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1952 Rover P4. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1952 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Rover P4 weights approximately 1388 kg more than 2000 Audi R8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi R8 (339 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Rover P4. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 1952 Rover P4 | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | R8 | P4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 2101 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 52 L |