2000 Audi R8 vs. 1961 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,595 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi R8 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 1083 kg more than 2000 Audi R8.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi R8 (339 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2000 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi R8 | 1961 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | R8 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3595 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 237 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2540 mm |
