2000 Audi R8 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi R8 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 2088 kg more than 2000 Audi R8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi R8 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | R8 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3595 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 237 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
