2000 Audi R8 vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,595 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi R8 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 ZAZ 966 weights approximately 738 kg more than 2000 Audi R8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi R8 (339 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Audi | ZAZ |
Model | R8 | 966 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2170 mm |