2000 Audi R8 vs. 1966 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,595 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi R8 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Taunus weights approximately 843 kg more than 2000 Audi R8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi R8 | 1966 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | R8 | Taunus |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3595 cc | 1183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 237 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 45 L |
