2000 Audi R8 vs. 1969 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,731 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi R8 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1969 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1163 kg more than 2000 Audi R8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 1969 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | R8 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 4731 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 41 L |