2000 Audi R8 vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2000 Audi R8. (237 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi R8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi R8. (339 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi R8.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | Audi | ZIL |
Model | R8 | 4104 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 7690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 312 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 607 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2100 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3890 mm |