2000 Audi R8 vs. 1992 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 3,595 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi R8 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Tracer. (127 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Tracer weights approximately 1102 kg more than 2000 Audi R8.
Because 2000 Audi R8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Audi R8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Tracer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi R8 (339 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercury Tracer. (154 Nm). This means 2000 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 1992 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | R8 | Tracer |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 154 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2510 mm |