2000 Audi R8 vs. 1994 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2000 Audi R8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,595 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi R8 (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1994 Toyota 4Runner. (113 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1994 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1598 kg more than 2000 Audi R8.
Because 1994 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Audi R8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi R8 (339 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Toyota 4Runner. (192 Nm). This means 2000 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 1994 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | R8 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 192 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2630 mm |