2000 Audi R8 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2004 GMC Savana is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi R8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi R8 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (295 HP) has 58 more horse power than 2000 Audi R8. (237 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi R8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 2351 kg more than 2000 Audi R8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Audi R8. (339 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Audi R8.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | R8 | Savana |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 295 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 448 Nm |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2 kg | 2353 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 117 L |