2000 Audi R8 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi R8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi R8 would be higher. At 3,884 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Audi R8. (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi R8.
Because 2000 Audi R8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Audi R8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi R8 (339 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Impala. (328 Nm). This means 2000 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 2006 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | R8 | Impala |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 3884 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 328 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |