2000 Audi R8 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi R8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi R8 would be higher. At 3,595 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Audi R8. (237 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi R8.
Because 2000 Audi R8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Audi R8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi R8 (339 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda CX-9. (338 Nm). This means 2000 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi R8 | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | R8 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3595 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 338 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |