2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 579 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 70 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 896 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | Rosemeyer | FX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 1032 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2620 mm |
