2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1952 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 412 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar C-Type. (218 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar C-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jaguar C-Type weights approximately 115 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Jaguar C-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 702 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar C-Type. (330 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar C-Type.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1952 Jaguar C-Type | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | Rosemeyer | C-Type |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 218 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2450 mm |