2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1954 Austin A 40
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 589 more horse power than 1954 Austin A 40. (41 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1954 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin A 40 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 948 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Austin A 40. (84 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1954 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | Rosemeyer | A 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 41 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 84 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2360 mm |