2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Riley RM A weights approximately 335 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1956 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | Rosemeyer | RM A |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2870 mm |
