2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1963 Austin A 99

To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 523 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 630 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.

Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 808 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 99. (224 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 99.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Audi Rosemeyer 1963 Austin A 99
Make Audi Austin
Model Rosemeyer A 99
Year Released 2000 1963
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 8003 cc 2912 cc
Engine Cylinders 16 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type W in-line
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 630 HP 107 HP
Torque 1032 Nm 224 Nm
Top Speed 349 km/hour 162 km/hour
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 900 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4550 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1250 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2920 mm 2800 mm