2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1963 BMW 1800
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 540 more horse power than 1963 BMW 1800. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 1800 weights approximately 200 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 BMW 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 888 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 1800. (144 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1963 BMW 1800 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | Rosemeyer | 1800 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 144 Nm |
Top Speed | 349 km/hour | 156 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2560 mm |