2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1965 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 606 more horse power than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi Rosemeyer weights approximately 300 kg more than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 991 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1965 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Audi | Steyr |
Model | Rosemeyer | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 24 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 41 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 1510 mm |