2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1966 MG 1100
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG 1100 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 577 more horse power than 1966 MG 1100. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1966 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi Rosemeyer weights approximately 75 kg more than 1966 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 MG 1100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 949 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1966 MG 1100 | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | Rosemeyer | 1100 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1096 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2380 mm |