2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 577 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 939 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | Rosemeyer | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 1032 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2430 mm |
