2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1974 Mazda 818
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 562 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 818. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mazda 818 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mazda 818. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 940 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 818. (92 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1974 Mazda 818 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | Rosemeyer | 818 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 1032 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2320 mm |
