2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1976 Citroen CX
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 524 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 365 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 871 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (161 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1976 Citroen CX | |
Make | Audi | Citroen |
Model | Rosemeyer | CX |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 161 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2850 mm |