2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1976 Rover 2000
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 488 more horse power than 1976 Rover 2000. (142 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1976 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rover 2000 weights approximately 432 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 760 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Rover 2000. (272 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1976 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Audi | Rover |
| Model | Rosemeyer | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 142 HP |
| Torque | 1032 Nm | 272 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1332 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2640 mm |
