2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1977 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 552 more horse power than 1977 Toyota Celica. (78 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1977 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Toyota Celica weights approximately 70 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 897 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Toyota Celica. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1977 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | Rosemeyer | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 78 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2430 mm |