2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 507 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 860 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (172 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | Rosemeyer | Celeste |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2350 mm |