2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1981 Chrysler Newport
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Newport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Newport would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 469 more horse power than 1981 Chrysler Newport. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1981 Chrysler Newport. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chrysler Newport weights approximately 910 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Chrysler Newport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 668 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Chrysler Newport. (364 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Chrysler Newport.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1981 Chrysler Newport | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | Rosemeyer | Newport |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 5210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | V |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 1032 Nm | 364 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 3020 mm |
