2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 580 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi Rosemeyer has manual transmission. 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Rosemeyer | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2760 mm |
