2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1981 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi Rosemeyer weights approximately 80 kg more than 1981 Toyota Tercel.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Toyota Tercel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Toyota Tercel has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi Rosemeyer has manual transmission. 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Toyota Tercel will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1981 Toyota Tercel | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Rosemeyer | Tercel |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2510 mm |
