2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 519 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (111 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Volvo 240 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 847 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (185 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | Rosemeyer | 240 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 2314 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 111 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2660 mm |