2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1984 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 6 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1984 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | Rosemeyer | XJR |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | V |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2870 mm |