2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 560 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 930 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | Rosemeyer | Colt |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1437 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2390 mm |