2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 541 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 853 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | Rosemeyer | Camaro |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | V |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 179 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2580 mm |