2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1990 Mercury Tracer
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mercury Tracer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mercury Tracer would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 542 more horse power than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1990 Mercury Tracer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mercury Tracer weights approximately 150 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Mercury Tracer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 886 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mercury Tracer. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mercury Tracer.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1990 Mercury Tracer | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | Rosemeyer | Tracer |
Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 88 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 146 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2510 mm |