2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1995 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 522 more horse power than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 200 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 885 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Nissan Pulsar. (147 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1995 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Rosemeyer | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 147 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2440 mm |