2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 2001 Proton 300
To start off, 2001 Proton 300 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi Rosemeyer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi Rosemeyer would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 555 more horse power than 2001 Proton 300. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 2001 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Proton 300 weights approximately 138 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 924 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 2001 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Audi | Proton |
| Model | Rosemeyer | 300 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 1032 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1038 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2450 mm |
