2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 2005 Mazda 3
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi Rosemeyer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi Rosemeyer would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 526 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 3. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Because 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 884 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 3. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 2005 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | Rosemeyer | 3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 148 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2610 mm |