2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Audi Rosemeyer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Audi Rosemeyer would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 364 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (266 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 851 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 730 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2000 Audi Rosemeyer has manual transmission. 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | Rosemeyer | CTS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 8003 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | W | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 630 HP | 266 HP |
| Torque | 1032 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2880 mm |
