2000 Audi RS4 vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 2000 Audi RS4 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 304 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi RS4 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi RS4 | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Audi | Simca |
Model | RS4 | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 2000 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2250 mm |